Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03485
Original file (BC 2012 03485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-03485
		        COUNSEL:  NONE
	  	        HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1. His 7 Mar 2012, 26 Jun 2012 and 19 Sep 2012 Fitness 
Assessments (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force 
Fitness Management System (AFFMS).      

2. In a letter dated 18 Nov 2012, the applicant amended his 
request to include the following:  His referral Enlisted 
Performance Report (EPR) for the period of 29 Feb 2012 to 11 Jul 
2012 be declared void and removed from his records.    

3. His promotion to the grade of technical sergeant (E-6), with 
a promotion effective date of 1 Sep 2012 be reinstated.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a preexisting medical condition that affected his ability 
to successfully pass the FAs.

His heart rate assessment during the one mile walk was not 
correctly assessed.

The push-up portion of the FA was incorrectly administered as 
the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) test monitor did not count the 
completed push-ups aloud or inform him of the ones that did not 
count prior to counting 17 push-ups.  

In support of his requests, he provides a personal statement, 
copies of AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s 
Qualification Status, the referral EPR, letters from his wing 
commander, FA test monitors and Primary Care Manager (PCM) and 
other various documents associated with his application. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________





STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant received a referral EPR, with an overall rating of 
“3” for the period of 29 Feb 2012 to 11 Jul 2012, for the failed 
FAs.   

As a result of the referral EPR, his promotion to the grade of 
technical sergeant effective 1 Sep 2012 was canceled. 

The applicant’s PCM’s letter, dated 26 Jul 2012, states the 
applicant has migraines, frequently exercise triggered, 
situational anxiety (may have generalized anxiety disorder) and 
sleep apnea which affected his ability to complete the FAs.   

AF Form 422, dated 1 Nov 2012, exempted the applicant from all 
components of the FA, except the abdominal circumference for the 
period of 21 Sep 2012 to 21 Sep 2013.  

On 14 Nov 2012, his wing commander rescinded the convening of a 
discharge review board in light of new information that the 
applicant had a medical condition precluding him from passing 
the three contested FAs.

On 28 Oct 2013, the applicant was medically retired in the grade 
of staff sergeant (E-5).      

The applicant’s most recent FA results are as follows:

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
 18 Dec 2012
75.5
Satisfactory (abdominal 
circumference only)
 19 Sep 2012
71.75
Unsatisfactory (exempt 
push-ups/sit-ups) 
 26 Jun 2012
73.00
Unsatisfactory 
 7 Mar 2012
72.50
Unsatisfactory
 29 Aug 2011
85.67
Satisfactory (exempt 
cardio/sit-ups)
 25 Feb 2011
81.56
Satisfactory (exempt 
sit-ups)
 28 Jan 2011
69.40
Unsatisfactory

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit B.  

________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of the applicant’s request for 
removal of the 7 Mar 2012, 26 Jun 2012 and 19 Sep 2012 FAs.  The 
evidence provided by the applicant supports his claim of a 
preexisting, undiagnosed medical condition.  The medical 
evidence links the chronic migraines and anxiety to the 
applicant’s inability to pass FAs. Specifically, the 
Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 18 Oct 2012, states 
that he is unable to run due to severe migraines, as a result, 
he is required to complete the walk which he fails due to an 
elevated heart rate.  The heart rate is a key factor in 
determining the outcome of the walk test and higher rates can 
reduce the amount of points achieved for the cardio component in 
accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-2905, Air Force Fitness 
Program, Air Force Guidance Memorandum (AFGM) 4.  

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

AFPC/DPSID recommends removal of the referral EPR if the Board 
grants the applicant’s request to void the three contested 
failed FAs.  Although the applicant did not exhaust available 
remedies by submitting an appeal to the Evaluation Report 
Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of Air Force 
Instruction 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation 
Reports, DPSID recommends removal of the referral EPR based on 
the recommendation of DPSIM that the applicant had a preexisting 
medical condition that affected his ability to successfully pass 
the FAs.  

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.

DPSOE states they have no equity in the decision to remove the 
failed FAs or referral EPR.  Should the Board grant the 
applicant’s request for removal of the three failed FAs and 
referral EPR, the Board could direct that the applicant’s 
selection for promotion to the grade of technical sergeant, with 
a date of rank and effective date of 1 Sep 2012, be reinstated.

The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 29 Oct 2013 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit E).  As of this date, this office has not received a 
response.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After a 
thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s 
submission, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of 
the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their 
rationale as our conclusion that the applicant was a victim of 
an error or injustice.  The medical evidence provided by the 
applicant substantiates he had a preexisting, undiagnosed 
medical condition and that his chronic migraines and anxiety 
impacted his ability to achieve a passing score on the 7 Mar 
2012, 26 Jun 2012 and 19 Sep 2012 FAs.  Furthermore, because the 
failed FAs resulted in the applicant receiving a referral EPR 
and cancellation of his promotion, to the grade of technical 
sergeant, we recommend the referral EPR for the period of 29 Feb 
2012 to 11 Jul 2012 be declared void and removed from his 
records and that his promotion to the grade of technical 
sergeant be reinstated with a date of rank and effective date of 
1 Sep   2012.  Accordingly, in the interest of justice, we 
recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated 
below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
 
     a. The Fitness Assessments dated 7 Mar 2012, 26 Jun     
2012 and 19 Sep 2012 be declared void and removed from the Air 
Force Fitness Management System.        

     b.  The Air Force Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB 
thru TSgt), rendered for the period of  29 Feb 2012 to 11 Jul 
2012 be declared void and removed from his records.         

     c.  He was promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (E-
6) effective and with a date of rank of 1 Sep 2012. 

	d.  His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge 
from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his retirement on 
28 Oct 2013, be amended to reflect he was retired in the rank of 
technical sergeant, pay grade of E-6, with an effective date of     
1 Sep 2012.  

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03485 in Executive Session on 9 Jan 2014, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

       , Panel Chair
       , Member
       , Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The 
following pertinent evidence in AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-
03485 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 31 Jul 2012, with atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 22 Jul 2013, w/atch.
        Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 19 Sep 2013.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 29 Sep 2013.  
	Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 2013.




					 
								Panel Chair



 

 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04871

    Original file (BC 2012 04871.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He disagrees with the findings of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility. The letter from his Flight Surgeon and 844th Communications Squadron Executive Director states that he was diagnosed with a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score and that he should be exempt from the cardio component...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05708

    Original file (BC 2012 05708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 Mar 2010, the applicant failed his FA with a score of 72.00. The applicant has failed to provide any information from all the rating officials on the contested report. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The EPR did not include his performance for the entire rating period.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04345

    Original file (BC 2013 04345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the demotion action and restore his rank to Technical Sergeant. Therefore, in view of the fact that we have determined the evidence is sufficient to conclude there was a causal nexus between the medical condition for which the applicant received a disability discharged and his ability to attain passing scores on his FAs, we also believe it is reasonable to conclude...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04469

    Original file (BC 2013 04469.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 14 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) directed that the applicant’s pertinent AFFMS records be updated to reflect the FAs dated 14 Dec 10, 2 Sep 11, and 1 Dec 11 be removed. The applicant provided medical documentation supporting his contention that his condition precluded him from attaining passing scores on the contested FAs and also provided two substitute reports signed by all of the original evaluators with memorandums supporting his request to substitute the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04719

    Original file (BC-2012-04719.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of the FA, he suffered from multiple serious medical conditions which warranted exemption from the full FA; however, he was required to take the AC portion. On 22 Nov 10, the applicant’s Wing Medical Group issued a memorandum, Clarification of AC Exemption Recommendation for FA, establishing the Exercise Physiologist working with the Senior Profile Officer as the only authorities who could recommend to commanders medical exemptions from components of an FA for a member with Duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04301

    Original file (BC-2012-04301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to have her 17 October 2011 FA removed from AFFMS. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 14 May 2013 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03538

    Original file (BC 2013 03538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 Feb 13, he was given a AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Qualification Status, which incorrectly authorized him to complete push-ups and sit-ups during FA testing, resulting in failure of his 28 Feb 13 FA because he only completed 10 push-ups. The applicant did not provide the Army version of the profile that was given to him, nor did he provide the original profile that should have been dated and signed by the Medical Provider on or about 15 Feb 13. While the Board notes the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00540

    Original file (BC-2013-00540.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00540 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) scores, dated 16 Jun 10, 23 Sep 10, 17 Dec 10, 25 Mar 11, 3 Jul 12, and 1 Oct 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant completed 36 sit-ups; however, the passing minimum score for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01534

    Original file (BC-2012-01534.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends updating the push-up component of the applicant’s fitness assessment to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS; which would change her overall composite score to 88.33 (Satisfactory). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSID recommends approval of the applicant’s request to remove her contested EPR. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04096

    Original file (BC 2013 04096.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of the applicant’s request to remove the 21 Oct 10 and 21 Dec 10 FAs from her records. Based on the documentation provided by the applicant, it is determined that the applicant was pregnant at the time the FAs were administered on 21 Oct...